ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic caused immediate and far-reaching disruption to society, the economy, and health-care services. We synthesised evidence on the effect of the pandemic on mental health and mental health care in high-income European countries. We included 177 longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional studies comparing prevalence or incidence of mental health problems, mental health symptom severity in people with pre-existing mental health conditions, or mental health service use before versus during the pandemic, or between different timepoints of the pandemic. We found that epidemiological studies reported higher prevalence of some mental health problems during the pandemic compared with before it, but that in most cases this increase reduced over time. Conversely, studies of health records showed reduced incidence of new diagnoses at the start of the pandemic, which further declined during 2020. Mental health service use also declined at the onset of the pandemic but increased later in 2020 and through 2021, although rates of use did not return to pre-pandemic levels for some services. We found mixed patterns of effects of the pandemic on mental health and social outcome for adults already living with mental health conditions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health , Adult , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are considered at elevated risk of experiencing mental health disorders in working with patients with COVID-19. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of common mental health disorders in HCWs based in hospitals where pandemic-affected patients were treated. Method: Databases were searched for studies published before 30 March 2020. Quantitative synthesis was used to obtain estimates of the prevalence of mental health disorders in four time windows, determined a priori (the acute phase, i.e. during and up to 1.5 months post-pandemic; 1.5-5.9 months; 6-11.9 months; 12 months and later). Results: Nineteen studies met the review criteria. They predominantly addressed the acute phase of the SARS outbreak in Asia. The most studied outcomes were clinically significant post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and general psychiatric caseness. For clinically significant PTSS in the acute phase, the prevalence estimate was 23.4% (95% CI 16.3, 31.2; N = 4147; I2 = 96.2%); in the 12 months plus window, the estimate was 11.9% (8.4, 15.8; N = 1136; I2 = 74.3%). For general psychiatric caseness, prevalence estimates were acute phase, 34.1% (18.7, 51.4; N = 3971; I2 = 99.1%); 6-12 months, 17.9% (13.1, 23.2; N = 223; I2 = 0.0%); 12 months plus, 29.3% (6.0, 61.0; N = 710; I2 = 97.8%). No differences between doctors and nurses with respective to PTSS and general psychiatric caseness were apparent in the acute phase. Conclusions: Mental health disorders are particularly common in HCWs working with pandemic-afflicted patients immediately following a pandemic, but the course of disorders following this period is poorly understood. There was considerable heterogeneity between studies, likely linked to methodological differences. More extended follow up of HCWs is needed.
Antecedentes: Se considera que los trabajadores de la salud (TS) tienen un riesgo elevado de experimentar trastornos de salud mental al trabajar con pacientes con COVID-19.Objetivo: Estimar la prevalencia de trastornos de salud mental comunes en los TS de los hospitales donde se trataron a pacientes afectados por una pandemia.Método: Se realizaron búsquedas en las bases de datos para estudios publicados antes del 30 de marzo de 2020. Se utilizó una síntesis cuantitativa para obtener estimaciones de la prevalencia de trastornos de salud mental en cuatro ventanas de tiempo, determinadas a priori (la fase aguda, es decir, durante y hasta 1,5 meses después de la pandemia; 1.5-5.9 meses; 6-11.9 meses; y después de 12 meses).Resultados: Diecinueve estudios cumplieron los criterios de esta revisión. Principalmente abordaron la fase aguda del brote de SARS en Asia. Los resultados más estudiados fueron los síntomas de estrés postraumático clínicamente significativos (SEPT) y casuística psiquiátrica general. Para los SEPT clínicamente significativo en la fase aguda, la estimación de prevalencia fue del 23,4% (IC del 95%: 16,3, 31,2; N = 4147; I2 = 96,2%); en los 12 meses adicionales, la estimación fue del 11,9% (8,4, 15,8; N = 1136; I2 = 74,3%). Para los casos de psiquiatría general, las estimaciones de prevalencia fueron: fase aguda, 34.1% (18.7, 51.4; N = 3971; I2 = 99.1%); 6-12 meses, 17.9% (13.1, 23.2; N = 223; I2 = 0.0%); después de 12 meses, 29.3% (6.0, 61.0; N = 710; I2 = 97.8%). No se observaron diferencias entre los médicos y las enfermeras con SEPT y casuística psiquiátrica general en la fase aguda.Conclusiones: Los trastornos de salud mental son particularmente comunes en los TS que trabajan con pacientes afectados inmediatamente después de la pandemia, pero el curso de los trastornos después de este período es poco conocido. Hubo una considerable heterogeneidad entre los estudios, probablemente vinculada a diferencias metodológicas. Se necesita un seguimiento más extenso de los TS.